• ADVERTISEMENT

    The Tale of Narcissus: Avoiding Vanity Metrics for Content Analytics

    by Clare Carr
    February 1, 2016
    "Echo and Narcissus" by John William Waterhouse Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.

    This story was originally published on the Parse.ly blog.

    Why do we want to know more about what our audiences read? Analytics and metrics provide us with a window into our success, a mirror to hold up and say: does this look as good as I think it does? But too much time looking in a mirror can be dangerous. Case in point: Narcissus.

    "To move beyond vanity to actionability requires commitment to one thing: connecting analytics to goals."

    “Unable to leave the beauty of his reflection, Narcissus lost his will to live. He stared at his reflection until he died.” (Wikipedia)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    How can you and your team avoid Narcissus’ fate?

    Making Sure Analytics are More than a Mirror

    Ultimately, the information that analytics provide should move you to improvement – to action – not just to stare at a mirror, or in our case, a screen. It’s all about separating the appeal of “vanity metrics” from the strategy of applying metrics.

    Example vanity metrics from Google Analytics dashboard.

    Example vanity metrics from Google Analytics dashboard.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    There’s plenty of discussion online of what vanity metrics consist of, and many of the metrics Parse.ly, or any digital analytics platform, provides could be considered vanity metrics: visits to your site, page views, your shares on social media, and engaged time. One attempt we take to help users see past this is providing the correct context in the dashboard.

    But to move beyond vanity to actionability requires commitment to one thing: connecting analytics to goals. The metrics themselves cannot be the end goal, they must be a means to something bigger — loyal readers, community impact, deeper understanding of a policy or topic.

    So why look at analytics at all? Seeing growth in a number over time can be a useful benchmark – especially if it connects to targeted goals that have been set for your site. For example, Moz.com Founder Rand Fishkin admits he only looks at vanity metrics, but with good reason:

    Rand Fishkin

    Rand Fishkin

    “That’s not to say I don’t also have metrics that tie to conversion rates for email subscriptions, clicks to the Moz website, signups for free trials, etc. But honestly, I almost never look beyond the vanity metrics of clicks, traffic, retweets, shares, likes, and +1s. And whenever I do, I find the same story – those vanity metrics line up pretty well with the more sophisticated, more action-worthy metrics.”

    What’s the danger of not lining up metrics with goals and outcomes? Metrics don’t change on their own, and without taking action on the data you’re seeing, you’re likely to continue seeing the same patterns. This frustration of not seeing the metrics has had some publishers question the value of an analytics system; without wondering if a better strategy or application would have helped those improve those metrics!

    How to Set Site Goals Using Analytics

    In our latest whitepaper, A Cheat Sheet for Digital Analysts, we walk through how media analysts and content marketers can create a data driven mindset within their team. There are three main steps we recommend in the guide:

    • Translate metrics into what they mean about the reader, and what that means for your content
    • Make data a conversation at your organization to inspire change, don’t use it as a lagging judgement of past work
    • Get agreement on goals across different parts of the organization

    If you’re interested in trying any of these tips out to make sure that your organization’s inner Narcissus isn’t winning the battle of vanity metrics!

    parsely_logo_verticalClare Carr is Parse.ly’s Director of Marketing. She writes and speaks about all the ways companies can use digital analytics to improve their operations and reach their audience goals.

    Tagged: analytics audience goals guide parsely tip sheet vanity metrics

    Comments are closed.

  • MediaShift received funding from the Bay Area Video Coalition (BAVC), which receives support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to launch the MetricShift section to create a vibrant hub for those interested in media metrics, analytics and measuring deeper impact.

    About MetricShift

    MetricShift examines the ways we can use meaningful metrics in the digital age. We provide thoughtful, actionable content on metrics, analytics and measuring impact through original reporting, aggregation, and audience engagement and community.

    Executive Editor: Mark Glaser

    Metrics Editor: Alexandra Kanik

    Associate Metrics Editor: Tim Cigelske

    Reader Advisory Board

    Chair: Anika Anand, Seattle Times Edu Lab

    Brian Boyer, NPR

    Clare Carr, Parse.ly

    Anjanette Delgado, Gannett

    Hannah Eaves, consultant, Gates Foundation

    Ian Gibbs, Guardian

    Lindsay Green-Barber, CIR/Reveal

    Celeste LeCompte, ProPublica

    Alisa Miller, PRI

    Connect with MetricShift

    Facebook group: Metrics & Impact

    Twitter: #MetricShift

    Email: alexandra [at] rationalact [dot] com

  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »

    Follow us on Social Media

    @MediaShiftorg
    @Mediatwit
    @MediaShiftPod
    Facebook.com/MediaShift