Journalism and Collaboration: Where Is the Content Creation Ecosystem Headed?

    by Matthew Gelfand
    April 10, 2014
    Draft allows users to quickly see differences between versions.

    This post originally appeared on Northwestern University Knight Lab’s blog.

    I once worked at a content creation agency in Boston where we churned out an exorbitant volume of content for client companies’ websites on a daily basis. Each writer was responsible for 15 to 20 stories per day that ranged from 200 to 500 words. We peer-edited and posted all of our work in a proprietary CMS, and the editing process was as follows:

    "The collaborative editing space is headed in the right direction, but there is still work to be done."
    1. Receive influx of emails from co-workers requesting story edits.
    2. Suggest edits in Gmail by manually highlighting them in different colors.
    3. Email colorfully edited story back to co-worker, who copy/pastes the revision into the CMS to be published.

    This was 2011. And it was terrible.


    Collaboration on the web has always been a challenge. Beyond the typically one-dimensional CMS, other familiar tools such as Google Docs and Dropbox also fall short because they either lack multimedia support (Docs) or don’t offer a true version control system (Dropbox).

    collaboration solutions

    Over the past year-and-a-half, however, a host of potential collaboration solutions have emerged. The first, and perhaps most prominent, Editorially, recently shut its doors despite much fanfare from users. Penflip and Draft offer similar functionality, while GitHub, long predicted by some to be a newsroom game changer, supports a content editor called Prose. It’s clear that people are starting to think more about improving collaboration among content creators.

    Editorially, one of the first and prominent of the collaborative “pre-CMS” tools, recently announced that it will shut down May 30 despite much fanfare from users.

    Editorially, one of the first and prominent of the collaborative “pre-CMS” tools, recently announced that it will shut down May 30 despite much fanfare from users.


    “I think the collaborative editing space has been largely overlooked because quality digital content has never been a top priority for most people,” says Loren Burton, founder of Penflip. “This is shifting as online content becomes more and more important. Producing quality content requires collaboration and good tools.”

    Penflip, which Burton has dubbed the “Github for writers,” takes a very literal approach to collaboration and applies the same workflow concepts that Github uses. As he explains in more detail on his blog, multiple editors can make changes via their own “branches,” or personal versions of the original “master” document. Once changes are made, they submit a request to the author to accept or deny the changes, which all other collaborators on the project are able to see. If accepted, those changes are merged onto the main document.

    Penflip also supports Markdown, an easy-to-use formatting syntax that is easily converted HTML, which means anything you can do in Markdown — such as inserting links or multimedia — you can do in Penflip. However, Burton notes that Penflip currently only supports image hosting, while audio and video must be hosted elsewhere.

    Penflip screenshot

    Penflip’s interface.

    The term “version control” might be foreign to web producers without a deeper technical background, but the concept is far from new. As Nate Kontny, founder of Draft, points out, writers have used similar methods with Microsoft Word for years, saving documents with different version numbers so they didn’t miss out on any changes. Version control has made manually saving each iteration and building up unnecessary files an antiquated process. The journalistic community should learn to embrace these modern interpretations, because people are still “petrified of losing their stuff,” Kontny says.

    Most of these systems attempt to improve content collaboration before it gets to the CMS, or as London-based GatherContent says, the “pre-CMS” experience.

    GatherContent’s founder James Deer’s background is in commercial work, but his experience is typical of news publishers large and small.

    “Typically a CMS isn’t great around content collaboration,” he said. “All of the content we’d need to post would arrive in dribs and drabs — word documents, spreadsheets, emails, physical leaflets etc. It meant that my clients and I would waste huge amounts of time deciphering everything into a format ready for the CMS.”

    GatherContent acts as a space for teams to, as Deer puts it, “centralize” all CMS content to iterate on and approve before it’s ready to be posted, which is just the problem many publishers face. They haven’t yet incorporated support for audio or video, but it’s a next step.

    The collaborative editing space is headed in the right direction, but there is still work to be done. While Medium, the popular writing platform, has taken blogging to the next level by adding peer editing features and multimedia support, rich media integration remains a stumbling block for version control-based text editors. That said, in a fairly short period of time we’ve advanced well beyond bloated Word files and colorful email edits, and journalists and web makers alike should continue to experiment with these tools and act as advocates for change with the goal of spurring new advancements.

    Matthew Gelfand is a Jersey native and Medill graduate student with interests in magazine layout and front-end design. Previously at Urban Daddy, The Improper Bostonian, Circus Media.

    knightlabThe Knight Lab is a team of technologists, journalists, designers and educators working to advance news media innovation through exploration and experimentation. Straddling the sciences and the humanities the Lab develops projects, prototypes and innovative bits of code that help make information meaningful, and promote quality journalism, storytelling and content on the internet. The Knight Lab is a joint initiative of Northwestern University’s Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science and the Medill School of Journalism. The Lab was launched and is sustained by a grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, with additional support from the Robert R. McCormick Foundation and the National Science Foundation.

    Tagged: collaboration content creation draft github journalism penflip prose
    • Thanks for the really useful article. At first I thought it was going to be about Intellectual Property in terms of how IP is managed in co-creation and collaboration and was poised to point readers at UK up-start Creative Barcode that has caused quite a stir in apositive way, with its easy, fast and low cost IP management system

      But instead its about version control – I agree Git Hub is great for web development as it enables a business to remain independent and in control of bespoke developers and their tantrums.

      I assume Git Hub for writers and editors would have the same benefits – and if something like Creative Barcode could be added into the same mix then IP including contributors can be recognised and credited throughout ….

      Now that’s a thought….. thanks again for the article

  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »
    MediaShift Newsletters »

    Follow us on Social Media