Hawaii First State to Propose Civic Crowdfunding Legislation

    by Rodrigo Davies
    March 26, 2014
    Credit: Hawaii Department of Education

    Hawaii has become the first state to propose a bill supporting civic crowdfunding, as it seeks to raise funds for the maintenance and repair of local schools.

    HB2631 outlines a pilot program in which two maintenance projects at Hawaii schools are selected for public crowdfunding campaigns.

    "A bigger question is whether or not blind redistribution at the platform level is the best way to direct civic crowdfunding, and how that strategy would be managed with a larger number of schools involved."

    The pilot would be operated by Hawaii 3R’s (Repair, Remode, Restore our Schools), a 501(c)(3) organization started by the late Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye in 2001 to raise private funds to contribute to the backlog in school maintenance projects in Hawaii.


    Here’s how it would work, if approved:

    • Hawaii 3R’s selects the two projects for the pilot, in consultation with the Hawaii department of education.
    • Projects must be “initiated by a member of the community and approved by” the school concerned.
    • Hawaii donates matching funds to Hawaii 3R’s up to a maximum of $50,000 per project.
    • 10 percent of the overall funds raised are donated to a Hawaii school that qualifies for Federal Financial Assistance.

    The bill, sponsored by Beth Fukumoto (R), Tom Brower (D), Richard Creagan (D), Aaron Ling Johanson (R) and Lauren Matsumoto (R), has passed its first reading and has been referred to the education and finance committees.

    The bill does five things that are quite interesting.


    a civic crowdfunding first

    Firstly, it’s the first legislation to use the term civic crowdfunding.

    Secondly, the proposers are careful to point out that the pilot builds on an existing fundraising mechanism:

    “The Hawaii 3R’s school repair and maintenance fund is an ideal mechanism for a civic crowdfunding pilot program because it already exists to receive private donations for public projects.”

    The method of bolting crowdfunding onto existing public-private models is a strategy I’ve seen used in many other cases, such crowdfunded parklets or Plazas in New York. It’s also a welcome reminder that civic crowdfunding is not an entirely new phenomenon, and should be understood in the context of existing public-private fundraising models.

    Thirdly, it mandates the superintendent of education to file a report on the performance of the program no later than 20 days prior to the convening of the 2015 session, including “a recommendation on the feasability of using crowdfunding to fund other projects in the department of education and proposed legislation as may be necessary to permanently implement crowdfunding.”

    Fourthly, it seeks to have a redistributive effect, by donating 10 percent of funds raised to a low-income school. The obvious short-run question is: “How will that school be selected?” But a bigger question is whether or not blind redistribution at the platform level is the best way to direct civic crowdfunding, and how that strategy would be managed with a larger number of schools involved. It could be argued, for example, that an alternative way to encourage redistribution through crowdfunding would be for the government to offer differential match-funding to schools depending on their socio-economic profile. This would have the added benefit of highlighting the work that is happening in those schools and building a connection between donors and lower-income schools.

    Fifthly, it doesn’t give either an estimate of the cost (the figure is blank, likely pending finance committee input) or the technical organization of the civic crowdfunding pilot. Will Hawaii use an existing platform, such as Citizinvestor, which posted the legislation on its blog, or will it attempt to create its own? DonorsChoose might wonder why they were not cited as an example given they are by far the most prominent education crowdfunding platform, although the focus on maintenance rather than classroom supplies may mean the DC model isn’t the right fit for Hawaii’s plans.

    I’m very interested to track the progress of the bill. If you’re familiar with Hawaii’s education system and have thoughts, I’d love to hear from you.

    Rodrigo Davies is a Research Assistant at MIT’s Center for Civic Media and an MS student in the Comparative Media Studies program. His research interests include the impact of social media on political discourse, crowdsourcing and political participation, ICT4D and user-led service design. Rodrigo works with the crisis mapping initiative Standby Task Force and is a policy advisor to the UK-based civic crowdfunding platform Spacehive. Before joining the Center Rodrigo was based Mumbai where he was a co-founding editor of Conde Nast India’s digital editorial business. Previously he was a journalist at the BBC and Bloomberg News. He holds a B.A. in History and Politics from Oxford University.

    This post originally appeared at the MIT Civic Media Center blog and rodrigodavies.com.

    Tagged: civic crowdfunding donorschoose education hawaii legislation schools

    Comments are closed.

  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »
    MediaShift Newsletters »

    Follow us on Social Media