For some time, Facebook has been in an elaborate dance with large news publishers, hoping to sweep their content off publishers’ sites and onto Facebook. While publishers have been wary of giving up control, many signed up for the new Instant Articles feature on Facebook’s iOS app, helping load their content quickly instead of the usual 8-second delay. But all media watchers aren’t necessarily welcoming it with open arms. They worry, understandably so, that in the transition to a mobile platform, their share of revenues will shrink just like it did from print to digital. But the social giant has offered some concessions, letting them keep all the ad revenue they sell themselves; they can also let Facebook sell ads and still get 70% of revenues. The key here is control. The social media giant has limited not just the number of ads publishers can add to their content but also the kinds of ads. And while the revenue split may seem to favor publishers, who’s to say Facebook won’t change the rate in the future? Facebook has become such a large source of traffic that should they decide to change the deal, many publishers would be hard pressed to walk away. Joining us this week to discuss Facebook Instant Articles will be John Herrman, editor at The Awl; Deepa Seetharaman, reporter at the Wall Street Journal; Michael Sebastian, reporter at Ad Age; and regular guest Andrew Lih at American University. PBS MediaShift’s Mark Glaser will host and Jefferson Yen will be producing.
Don’t have a lot of time to spare but still want to listen to the Mediatwits? Then check out our Digital Media Brief below!
Mediatwits: Full Episode
Digital Media Brief
Listen to the Mediatwits and follow us on SoundCloud! Thanks to SoundCloud for providing audio support. Subscribe to the Mediatwits audio version via iTunes. Follow @TheMediatwits on Twitter. Subscribe to our YouTube Channel.
MEDIATWITS BIOS
Mark Glaser is executive editor of MediaShift and Idea Lab. He is a longtime freelance writer and editor, who has contributed to magazines such as Entertainment Weekly, Wired and Conde Nast Traveler, and websites such as CNET and the Yale Global Forum. He lives in San Francisco with his wife Renee and son Julian. You can follow him on Twitter @mediatwit.
Andrew Lih is a new media journalist and associate professor of journalism at the American University School of Communication. He is the author of “The Wikipedia Revolution” (Hyperion 2009, Aurum UK 2009) and is a noted expert on online collaboration and journalism. He is a veteran of AT&T Bell Laboratories and in 1994 created the first online city guide for New York City (www.ny.com). Follow him on Twitter @fuzheado.
SPECIAL GUESTS
John Herrman is co-editor of The Awl. He previously worked at Gizmodo, Popular Mechanics, and most recently Buzzfeed, where he wrote about the structure and culture of the internet. He lives in New York. Find him @jwherrman
Deepa Seetharaman covers Facebook and LinkedIn for WSJD, The Wall Street Journal’s global technology bureau. She previously worked for Reuters, covering e-commerce, in San Francisco as well as the U.S. auto industry in Detroit. She’s @dseetharaman
Michael Sebastian covers the media business for Advertising Age, including the often confusing world of content marketing and native advertising. He joined Ad Age in 2013 after founding PR Daily, a daily news site covering digital marketing and public relations. He started his career as a newspaper reporter in Chicago. He’s @msebastian
BACKGROUND
The big fear with FB’s new feature, as John Herrman writes, is “Instant allows publishers to hand over nearly all of their mobile business to Facebook.” Mobile readers are becoming increasingly important to publishers. Pew’s State of News revealed more people are visiting news sites on their phones and tablets than on their desktops. Mobile ads accounted for 65 percent of Facebook’s ad revenue last year — that’s $7.5 billion. But not everyone thinks Instant Articles will be a problem. Vox’s Timothy B. Lee writes that while Facebook’s leverage over the publishing industry is problematic, Instant Articles could lead to more people reading the news.
Is it any wonder that a tech company like Facebook would be more ready to capitalize on readers moving to mobile than publishers? It’s still too early to tell whether Facebook’s Instant Articles constitutes an inflection point for the industry. Let’s just get it out of the way: Facebook’s Instant Articles is a fast and also, subjectively speaking, prettier way to read the news on your mobile device. For most people, that’s reason enough to use this app. But it does reflect poorly on the experience of using the mobile web. That’s why Snapchat is trying to get into the news. It’s the same reason major publications feel the need to create stand-alone apps. The field is still wide open in mobile, and Facebook isn’t the only one player on the board.
What’s the end game for Facebook and publishers? Can they co-exist and both benefit? Or should publishers remain wary of the social giant?
Jefferson Yen is the producer for the Mediatwits Podcast. His work has been on KPCC Southern California Public Radio and KRTS Marfa Public Radio. You can follow him @jeffersontyen.
