• ADVERTISEMENT

    How Newsrooms Can Win Back Their Reputations

    by Scott Rosenberg
    June 24, 2011

    The journalism industry ships lemons every day. Our newsrooms have a massive quality control problem. According to the best counts we have, more than half of stories contain mistakes — and only 3 percent of those errors are ever fixed.

    Errors small and large litter the mediascape, and each uncorrected one undermines public trust in news organizations. In Pew’s last survey in September 2009, only 29 percent of Americans believed that the press “get the facts right.”

    i-dc9ca6893c68cc73046fd053f687143e-lemon.jpg

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Yet the tools and techniques to fix this problem are known and simple. I’ve been working in this area for the last two years. Here’s a distillation of what I’ve learned: three basic steps any online news organization can take today to tighten quality control, reduce errors and build public trust.

      1. Link generously

      A piece without links is like a story without the names of its sources. Every link tells a reader, “I did my research. And you can double-check me.”

      ADVERTISEMENT
    • Read more on the value of links: In Defense of Links.

      2. Show your work

      The news isn’t static, and online stories don’t have to be, either. Every article or post can and should be improved after it’s published. Stay accountable and transparent by providing a “history” of every version of each story (à la Wikipedia) that lets readers see what’s changed.

    • Read a longer argument for the value of versioning.
      Or try out the WordPress plugin.

      3. Help people report your mistakes

      The Internet is a powerfully efficient feedback mechanism. Yet many news organizations don’t use it. Put a report-an-error button on every story: It tells readers you want to know when you’ve goofed. Then pay attention to what they tell you.

    • Get some report-an-error buttons at the Report an Error Alliance.
      Or use the MediaBugs widget.

    Why aren’t these practices more widely adopted? Here are four reasons:

    1. Workflow and tools
    In many newsrooms, especially those still feeding print or broadcast outlets, it’s still way too hard to fix errors or add links to a story for its web edition. And content-management systems don’t yet offer corrections and history tools “out of the box.”

    2. Denial and avoidance
    Other people make errors. Many editors and reporters don’t believe the problem is serious, or think it doesn’t apply to them. And most don’t understand how badly their web feedback loop is broken.

    3. Fear of readers
    Many journalists view readers as adversaries. The customer they feel they’re serving is an abstraction; the specific reader with a complaint is “someone with an agenda” whom they have a duty to ignore.

    4. Where’s the money?
    Many media companies are in financial free-fall. Correction systems and trust-building tools don’t bring in revenue directly, and they eat up product-development time and money.

    These are serious obstacles. But journalists will never regain public trust unless we overcome them.

    Ask journalists what sets them apart from everyone else sharing information online and we’ll say: We care about accuracy. We correct our mistakes. In a changing media economy that’s challenging the survival of our profession, we need to follow through on those avowals. Otherwise, we shouldn’t be surprised when Pew’s next biennial survey of public trust in the media shows even more dismal results.

    Photo of lemons courtesy of flickr user CocteauBoy.

    Tagged: corrections errors journalism news newsrooms quality control versioning

    Comments are closed.

  • MediaShift received funding from the Bay Area Video Coalition (BAVC), which receives support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to launch the MetricShift section to create a vibrant hub for those interested in media metrics, analytics and measuring deeper impact.

    About MetricShift

    MetricShift examines the ways we can use meaningful metrics in the digital age. We provide thoughtful, actionable content on metrics, analytics and measuring impact through original reporting, aggregation, and audience engagement and community.

    Executive Editor: Mark Glaser

    Metrics Editor: Alexandra Kanik

    Associate Metrics Editor: Tim Cigelske

    Reader Advisory Board

    Chair: Anika Anand, Seattle Times Edu Lab

    Brian Boyer, NPR

    Clare Carr, Parse.ly

    Anjanette Delgado, Gannett

    Hannah Eaves, consultant, Gates Foundation

    Ian Gibbs, Guardian

    Lindsay Green-Barber, CIR/Reveal

    Celeste LeCompte, ProPublica

    Alisa Miller, PRI

    Connect with MetricShift

    Facebook group: Metrics & Impact

    Twitter: #MetricShift

    Email: alexandra [at] rationalact [dot] com

  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »

    Follow us on Social Media

    @MediaShiftorg
    @Mediatwit
    @MediaShiftPod
    Facebook.com/MediaShift