• ADVERTISEMENT

    Judge Quashes Subpoena to Blogger Kathleen Seidel

    by David Ardia
    April 23, 2008

    A federal magistrate judge in New Hampshire has quashed the subpoena issued to Kathleen Seidel. Seidel publishes the blog Neurodiversity,
    where she writes about autism issues. In February 2008, she wrote about a lawsuit against various vaccine manufacturers, Sykes v. Bayer,
    in which the plaintiffs Lisa and Seth Sykes seek to link exposure to
    mercury to their son’s autism. (For more on her statements about the
    lawsuit, see my previous post: Blogger Kathleen Seidel Fights Subpoena Seeking Information About Vaccine Litigation.)

    On March 24, 2008, Clifford Shoemaker, an attorney for the Sykes, served Seidel with a subpoena
    in connection with the Sykes v. Bayer lawsuit. The subpoena demanded
    that Seidel appear for a deposition on April 30, 2008, and that she
    produce a shockingly broad collection of information, including her bank statements, tax returns,
    communications with religious organizations, and personal
    correspondence with other bloggers.

    On April 21, magistrate judge Muirhead granted Seidel’s well argued motion to quash the subpoena. In so doing, the judge also ordered Shoemaker

    ADVERTISEMENT

    to show cause within 10 days why he should not be sanctioned under Fed R Civ P 11 – see Fed R Civ P 45(a)(2)(B) which requires that a deposition subpoena be issued from the court in which the deposition is to occur and Fed R Civ P 45 ©(1)
    commanding counsel to avoid burdensome subpoenas. A failure to appear
    will result in notification of Mr Shoemaker’s conduct to the Presiding Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia.

    Shoemaker will have a difficult time explaining why the subpoena he
    issued is justified, as it demands the disclosure of documents that
    appear to have no relevance to the
    Sykes litigation. Instead, it is rather obvious that the subpoena was
    intended to coerce a critic of his clients to “shut up.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The use of unjustified legal threats
    should never be allowed to silence speech. We all lose when we
    allow that to happen.

    (You can follow further developments in the case by going to the entry in the Citizen Media Law Project’s Legal Threats Database: Sykes v. Seidel.)

    Tagged: bloggers cmlp legal threat litigation subpoena

    Comments are closed.

  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »
    MediaShift Newsletters »

    Follow us on Social Media

    @MediaShiftorg
    @Mediatwit
    @MediaShiftPod
    Facebook.com/MediaShift