• ADVERTISEMENT

    U.S. House Passes Federal Shield Bill, Changes Who is Covered

    by David Ardia
    October 17, 2007

    One of the things we are doing at the Citizen Media Law Project is keeping our eye on new legislation that might have an impact on non-traditional journalists. 

    Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed — for the first time ever — a federal shield bill by a vote of 398 to 21. This follows on the heels of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s passage
    of a similar bill on October 4. The House version, however, makes a
    critical change in the language regarding who is entitled to the bill’s
    qualified protections by excluding those who do not receive
    “substantial financial gain” for their journalistic activities.

    This change significantly narrows the bill’s coverage and is plainly
    aimed to exclude non-traditional journalists. But it doesn’t just
    exclude those whom some in Congress derisively call “bloggers.” The new
    definition would likely exclude many freelance journalists who must
    rely on other work to supplement their incomes. Do we really want
    judges to be deciding whether a journalist is earning enough money to
    qualify for protection?

    ADVERTISEMENT

    More to the point, is financial remuneration the criterion we
    want to be using when we draw the line between those who are entitled
    to engage in journalism under the protection of a federal shield law
    and those who must venture forth unprotected? It seems to me the answer
    is no. To limit the privilege only to journalists who receive
    “substantial financial gain” misses the point of how media and
    journalism are evolving. Most crucially, it misses the growing — and
    essential — role of citizen media creators. They are the closest
    analog since the nation’s founding to the Tom Paine-style pamphleteers
    the First Amendment was designed, in part, to encourage.

    Journalists — and more importantly, the public — desperately need a
    federal shield law. But what we need is a federal shield law that
    protects all acts of journalism regardless of whether they are done for
    pay.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    You can read a longer discussion of the House and Senate bills on our blog.  We’ve also created a set of shield law resources that provide additional background on the subject and provide information on federal and state shield protections.

    Tagged: cmlp law legal shield law

    Comments are closed.

  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Who We Are

    MediaShift is the premier destination for insight and analysis at the intersection of media and technology. The MediaShift network includes MediaShift, EducationShift, MetricShift and Idea Lab, as well as workshops and weekend hackathons, email newsletters, a weekly podcast and a series of DigitalEd online trainings.

    About MediaShift »
    Contact us »
    Sponsor MediaShift »

    Follow us on Social Media

    @MediaShiftorg
    @Mediatwit
    @MediaShiftPod
    Facebook.com/MediaShift