X
    Categories: Culture

Is Twitter a waste of time?

“Twitter is like an RSS feed to every boring aspect of your friend’s lives. And your friends are boring. How could they not be?” So writes Helen A.S. Popkin on MSNBC in one of many scathing reviews of the micro-blogging tool Twitter. Twitter lets you update other friends in your social network about your whereabouts on a micro-level from your cell phone via text messaging or through instant messaging or the web. Ever since the recent South by Southwest conference, usage for Twitter has been doubling every three weeks, according to the service’s founders, though they wouldn’t provide exact numbers. But the open question is whether there is a business there, and whether all those Twitter feeds are adding to our realm of human knowledge or distracting us immensely. What do you think? Is Twitter and other micro-blogging services the future of communication or a terrible waste of time? Share your thoughts in the comments below and I’ll share the best ones in the next Your Take Roundup.

Mark Glaser :Mark Glaser is founder and executive director of MediaShift. He contributes regularly to Digital Content Next’s InContext site and newsletter. Glaser is a longtime freelance journalist whose career includes columns on hip-hop, reviews of videogames, travel stories, and humor columns that poked fun at the titans of technology. From 2001 to 2005, he wrote a weekly column for USC Annenberg School of Communication's Online Journalism Review. Glaser has written essays for Harvard's Nieman Reports and the website for the Yale Center for Globalization. Glaser has written columns on the Internet and technology for the Los Angeles Times, CNET and HotWired, and has written features for the New York Times, Conde Nast Traveler, Entertainment Weekly, the San Jose Mercury News, and many other publications. He was the lead writer for the Industry Standard's award-winning "Media Grok" daily email newsletter during the dot-com heyday, and was named a finalist for a 2004 Online Journalism Award in the Online Commentary category for his OJR column. Glaser won the Innovation Journalism Award in 2010 from the Stanford Center for Innovation and Communication. Glaser received a Bachelor of Journalism and Bachelor of Arts in English at the University of Missouri at Columbia, and currently lives in San Francisco with his wife Renee and his two sons, Julian and Everett. Glaser has been a guest on PBS' "Newshour," NPR's "Talk of the Nation," KALW's "Media Roundtable" and TechTV's "Silicon Spin." He has given keynote speeches at Independent Television Service's (ITVS) Diversity Retreat and the College Media Assocation's national convention. He has been part of the lecture/concert series at Yale Law School and Arkansas State University, and has moderated many industry panels. He spoke in May 2013 to the Maui Business Brainstormers about the "Digital Media Revolution." To inquire about speaking opportunities, please use the site's Contact Form.

View Comments (9)

  • I'm probably grossly oversimplifying what Twitter is, and why it's useful, but to me it seems like just another form of Internet chat. From what I've seen of its use (as I have yet to become a twitter-er), it looks like people are using it exactly like AOL Instant Messenger, ICQ, and other chat programs were used when they first came out.

    A distraction at worst, but a tool for collaboration at best. In fact, Twitter almost seems a step backwards from most chat programs, as the chat is relatively static, and requires users to seek out your posts rather than using a chat window in which the messages come to you.

  • Personally, I don't think it's worth the hype it's getting. It may be useful for very specific niches, but I don't see what the company really brings to the table in terms of technology or concept. I'm sure most IM infrastructures can be extended to do this, viz. act in broadcast mode and downgrade clients to really shorten message lengths (ironically) and this, to me, seems a step in the backward direction.

  • I started using twitter.com recently. My friends haven't jumped on the bandwagon, but I find that it actually helps me to be more aware of my activities throughout the day. I always include my web address in my microblog in case somebody needs me: http://georgeclarkhomes.com/

  • I like the idea of microblogging and "moblogging" - I can update from anywhere with my phone, and I have the widget posted on my website and MySpace like asides on the blog.

  • Twitter is a beautiful micro-blogging community which provides a communication medium which enhances the collapse of time for delivering a message to the community and your friends. Please visit twitter.com/646 and you will see a demonstration of a nice Web 2.0 environment which provides information in a timely fashion.

  • i think it's clever but more pet rock than frisbee....lots of neat stuff happening for cell phones. besides twitter i like mocospace.com for chatting with ppl and tagtag.com for building little mobile web sites

  • I like the idea of microblogging and "moblogging" - I can update from anywhere with my phone, and I have the widget posted on my website and MySpace like asides on the blog.

  • Twitter is great. We have a circle of friends who all use it, and we all read each-other's posts. I am reminded that back in the 1960's, my grandmother would call her elderly widowed sister-in-law every evening, just to "check-in". They rarely spoke for more than a minute or two. For us, Twitter is the same thing - just a little check-in without the bother of a whole personalized email. My only complaint is that it is DOWN so often - even as I type this, I can't get in to Twitter! ACK! :-(

  • Great collaboration tool as well as chat sessions for those boring days at work. Bringing global communication closer to home.

Comments are closed.