Last week, ESPN’s Grantland published a story by Caleb Hannan called “Dr. V’s Magical Putter,” a piece that on its face looked into the ambitious claims of Essay Anne Vanderbilt (a.k.a. Dr. V), the inventor of a golf putter called Yar. The article ended up being less about a putter and more about the inventor and her secret about being a transgender woman. Dr. V had committed suicide months before the article was published and weeks after last speaking with the reporter. In the aftermath of the article, the reporter and Grantland have been widely attacked for prioritizing the story over compassion. Grantland’s editor-in-chief issued a point-by-point apology Monday in tandem with a piece titled “What Grantland Got Wrong” by an ESPN staff writer, Christina Kahrl, who is a transgender woman. This week on Mediatwits, we’re joined by special guest Poynter’s Kelly McBride to talk about the ethics of Grantland’s reporting, as well a Gawker’s features editor Tom Scocca, who wrote this piece about the controversy. We’ll also be joined by American University’s Andrew Lih, and as usual, PBS MediaShift’s Mark Glaser will host.
Subscribe to the MediaShift audio podcast here.
Listen to the Mediatwits and follow us on SoundCloud!
Thanks to SoundCloud for providing audio support. Subscribe to the Mediatwits audio version via iTunes.
Follow @TheMediatwits on Twitter.
MEDIATWITS BIOS
SPECIAL GUESTS
BACKGROUND
The reporter was undoubtedly working with a tough story: a profile of an inventor who fabricated most details she shared with him. She never attended MIT or Wharton or worked on top-secret government projects. But many commentators have criticized the article for conflating her dishonesty about her professional history with her desire to keep her gender identity private. The article was also denounced for outing Dr. V, even posthumously, since she had made her desire for privacy clear. Where does fact-finding end, and cruel privacy-encroachment begin? How should a reporter gauge which details are fair game, and which aren’t?
OTHER NEWS:
Dow Jones Chief Resigns in Shift by News Corp. (NY Times)
Why The Washington Post Passed on Ezra Klein (Politico)
Teens Love Instagram But Aren’t Abandoning Facebook (GigaOm)
How an Intern Created the NYT’s Dialect Quiz, the Site’s Most-Visited Content in 2013 (Knight Lab)
Claire Groden is the podcast intern for PBS Mediashift and a senior at Dartmouth College. You can follow Claire on Twitter @ClaireGroden.
View Comments (1)
The best way to gauge an issue about a transgender (in this case transsexual) person is to ask. A transsexual person who didn't advertise her back history did so because she didn't wished to be mired in their old life. It isn't fraudulent to leave it out of a paper, but it will create needless social devastation. Dr. V may have killed herself because of the actual frauds she did commit in her credentials, especially if they involved possible prosecution. We will never know because there was no note.
There is a tropism in our society that makes transgender and transsexual lives out to be deceptive. This article served to further that prejudice. Had Caleb Hannan thought the matter enough to vet the article, he would have discerned how devastating this would be not just to Dr. V's memory, but also to living TG/TS people, who transition to feel genuine in our own lives.
The addition of the transgender aspect added nothing to the story of the fraud Dr. V committed, a very legitimate story. It did serve to reinforce the salacious opinions of certain segments of society about TG/TS people, and that, my dear friends, is why we are upset about this article.