X
    Categories: Culture

Spelling Out the Media Shift


The media world is going through a time of wrenching change brought on by new technology, the rise of the Internet and folks getting fed up with the corporate mass media losing touch with their reality. How can a mega-chain of newspapers, a TV broadcast conglomerate, or a cookie-cutter radio system interpret what’s going on in your neighborhood? And in the world of entertainment, the big companies are more concerned with prosecuting file-traders than helping create easy digital avenues for customers to get what they want when they want it.

But the media shift isn’t just about small vs. big. It’s also about a new way of thinking, or perhaps bringing back an old way of thinking that’s been lost in the era of big media mergers and the bottom-line focus on profits over serving people. The democratization of media is about letting a billion flowers bloom, and turning the power of news analysis, commentary, punditry and spoofery over to the people, now that they have the cheap technology of blogs, digital video cameras and broadband Internet access.

And with this change comes a lot of trial and error, experiments that really cut through the hype and those that fall short. Sometimes these new intiatives are just old ideas dressed up in new media clothes. So I’ve decided to try to spell out how the media is shifting, both in mindset and in practical, real world ways.

Oldthink: Using focus groups and customer surveys to learn what people want.
Newthink: Employing real-time feedback loops such as online forums, blog comments, and wikis to capture the input of people.

Oldthink: Big brands such as Wal-Mart trying to look cool with limited social networking sites.
Newthink: A social networking site such as Xanga that spells out the dangers without filtering in advance.

Oldthink: Video services such as MTV Overdrive that limit the user base by requiring Windows PCs with the Internet Explorer browser.
Newthink: Video services such as YouTube that use technology such as Flash that doesn’t shut out Macs and Firefox web browsers.

Oldthink: Building a digital video recorder that doesn’t allow people to fast-forward through commercials.
Newthink: TiVo launches “Product Watch,” where subscribers can request information on products or services that interest them.

Oldthink: Making people watch TV advertising in public spaces such as grocery lines and elevators.
Newthink: Opening up the creative process by letting people create their own TV ads, such as what Chevy did for the Tahoe SUV.

Oldthink: Forcing people to register in order to read a news site or watch a video service, and then inundate them with targeted advertising.
Newthink: Letting people view a site without registering, and serve up targeted ads based on the interests of that person — a.k.a. behavioral advertising.

Oldthink: Relying on mainstream media TV coverage to follow wars and conflicts.
Newthink: Reading bloggers or citizen journalists who are eyewitnesses to wars, or soldier bloggers who are participants and can share their own stories in words or video. Seeing photos from people with cameraphones at the scene.

Oldthink: Reading, listening or watching media on the schedules set by executives and programmers.
Newthink: Getting the information, news and entertainment we want, when we want it, on the device we want it, with or without commercials.

Oldthink: Turning on car radios to hear the music or radio shows we enjoy.
Newthink: Getting satellite radio or plugging in portable MP3 players to our car stereos so we can listen to hundreds of commercial-free stations on satellite or thousands of podcasts downloaded from the Internet.

Oldthink: Believing the major news organizations will always get big stories right, and not make any mistakes along the way.
Newthink: Following credible bloggers who can unearth Photoshopped photos from a war zone, mistakes in coverage or bias, and faked sources for stories in mainstream media articles.

Oldthink: Thinking professional editors are the only ones who can decide what the important stories are each day.
Newthink: Realizing we have the power to choose what’s important, whether through aggregation services such as Google News or people-powered news sites such as Digg or personalized sites such as My Yahoo.

I invite you to add your own Oldthink vs. Newthink views on changes in the media world in the comments below. If enough people contribute, I’ll come back to this and update it with your ideas and thoughts.

[Photo by Eugene Zhukovsky.]

Mark Glaser :Mark Glaser is founder and executive director of MediaShift. He contributes regularly to Digital Content Next’s InContext site and newsletter. Glaser is a longtime freelance journalist whose career includes columns on hip-hop, reviews of videogames, travel stories, and humor columns that poked fun at the titans of technology. From 2001 to 2005, he wrote a weekly column for USC Annenberg School of Communication's Online Journalism Review. Glaser has written essays for Harvard's Nieman Reports and the website for the Yale Center for Globalization. Glaser has written columns on the Internet and technology for the Los Angeles Times, CNET and HotWired, and has written features for the New York Times, Conde Nast Traveler, Entertainment Weekly, the San Jose Mercury News, and many other publications. He was the lead writer for the Industry Standard's award-winning "Media Grok" daily email newsletter during the dot-com heyday, and was named a finalist for a 2004 Online Journalism Award in the Online Commentary category for his OJR column. Glaser won the Innovation Journalism Award in 2010 from the Stanford Center for Innovation and Communication. Glaser received a Bachelor of Journalism and Bachelor of Arts in English at the University of Missouri at Columbia, and currently lives in San Francisco with his wife Renee and his two sons, Julian and Everett. Glaser has been a guest on PBS' "Newshour," NPR's "Talk of the Nation," KALW's "Media Roundtable" and TechTV's "Silicon Spin." He has given keynote speeches at Independent Television Service's (ITVS) Diversity Retreat and the College Media Assocation's national convention. He has been part of the lecture/concert series at Yale Law School and Arkansas State University, and has moderated many industry panels. He spoke in May 2013 to the Maui Business Brainstormers about the "Digital Media Revolution." To inquire about speaking opportunities, please use the site's Contact Form.

View Comments (28)

  • As usual, outstanding post, Mark. This often reminds me of that great book from Clayton Christensen, "The Innovator's Dilemma". While all the media companies are off protecting their own interests and clinging to the eyeballs they still attract, the door is left wide open for the upstarts to come in and offer a new, disruptive alternative. I struggle with it in my own business, so I'm not immune either!

    I have a few other thoughts on this as well -- too much to go into with a comment. You can find them here on my blog: http://jwikert.typepad.com/the_average_joe/2006/08/mark_glaser_on_.html. Keep up the great work!
    Joe

  • Great post, Mark!

    1) As you know, I think it not too wise to rely on only customized news sources such as Yahoo News, Google News. We need the diversity of the news and it is a bit dangerous only being exposed to news which you want to see. A big part in all democracies is to be exposed to things you do not want to see. I am not sure the current setup of those services fulfill that need.

    2) On community driven websites:

    Old think: We create the content on our websites.

    Interim think: Everyone contribute to the site.

    New think: Everyone can contribute to a site with "some slight edition". This "slight edition" can be done either by the community or by a selected group of editors preferable from the contributors. Many forms are available but still the edition part is crucial for most websites.

    The overuse of community driven websites is a bit surprising. Looking at the successful sites on the web, all of them have a slight touch of hierarchy. This is a well-known phenomena and for the un-believer I recommend to visit http://www.shirky.com The basic conclusion which has been made in sociology studies is that without the some structure the group will get stuck in debate mode and not move forward. In some cases this could be fine, and in some cases not fine.

    What do we learn? We learn that building those sites are far from easy and is a delicate issue. Moreover it takes a lot of time. Just getting a lot of people posting is in itself not the solution. It really takes some effort to build those. The dilemma you are facing is that some structure is needed, but how can you preserve the creative environment and still make it go forward and not get stuck? It is doable, but takes time.

  • Great thoughts, everyone. Glad I could spark even more thinking from you all. I would very much like to include your Oldthink/Newthink items in a future post on MediaShift. It's important for us to keep thinking about what's working and what's not.

  • Oldthink: It was smart to pay to get to the top of a search list or on the front page.

    Newthink: Be where people will want you - they will ignore those who pay extra to be noticed.

    Oldthink: People trust the masthead and all it carries.

    Newthink: People trust people more - now that people have their own voice.

    Oldthink: the price of a classified ad is based on the number of gatekeepers.

    Newthink: the price of a classified ad is based the cost of providing the service.

  • Oldthink: We've gotta get everybody to come to our site to view our content.

    Newthink: We've gotta get our content out to all the sites at the edge of the web where people want to spend their time.

  • Oldthink: Talent will come to us, they'll feel lucky to be here and they will put up with whatever we dish out.
    Newthink: We have to aggressively get talent, train and retain them...or they will leave. We have to hire people who are not like ourselves and know we did the right thing.

  • Old Think: Reaping incredibly high profit margins with a paid product and carpet-bombing advertising by auto dealerships and grocery stores. Having an unprecedented number of feet on the street to cover a community.

    New Think: Unreliable revenue streams. Hollow critiques of the MSM masquerading as cutting edge. Editors? Who needs stinkin' editors?

Comments are closed.