This week, in honor of MediaShift’s launch of EducationShift, we’re turning our gaze to one of the biggest issues in higher education: digital disruption — with the advent of online education, e-learning and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). If the New York Times called 2012 “The Year of the MOOC,” then two years later, it’s high time to check in on how the buzzy education model has worked out. Prestigious schools including Stanford, MIT, Harvard, Princeton and others have all jumped on the bandwagon, partnering with MOOC providers to put free courses online for the masses. But recently, dropout rates as high as 97 percent have cast doubt on the benefits of MOOCs. How effective are MOOCs, and how might they contribute to future models of education? And, what about other models of online education, like e-learning? We’re joined by Rosental Alves, Director of the Knight Center that has created a variety of journalism MOOCs, and MIT postdoc Daniel Seaton, who co-authored a review of MIT and Harvard’s MOOCs. Regular panelists Andrew Lih of American University and Reuters’ Felix Salmon will also pitch in. As usual, PBS MediaShift’s Mark Glaser will host.
Subscribe to the MediaShift audio podcast here.
Listen to the Mediatwits and follow us on SoundCloud!
Thanks to SoundCloud for providing audio support. Subscribe to the Mediatwits audio version via iTunes.
Follow @TheMediatwits on Twitter.
MEDIATWITS BIOS
SPECIAL GUESTS
BACKGROUND
Seaton and his co-author’s report pushes back against the frequently cited statistic of MOOCs’ high dropout rates. While few of the original enrollees finish a given course, each person approaches a course differently: some just to download the reading material or view the syllabus. The probability that a student would stop engaging with material after week two was only 16 percent, they found. But, attrition rates aside, other problems persist. If a student enrolled in a barrage of MOOCs, would that add up to a bachelors degree? One journalist tried this exact experiment and found significant variation in the quality and difficulty of the classes. How are MOOCs evolving to take into account these criticisms, and what is their role in higher education?
Beyond MOOCs, the internet has offered a variety of other ways for students to engage with material online. One program, Minerva Schools of KGI, is currently admitting its inaugural class that will engage in online and classroom learning to earn degrees. Though students are required to live on campus and attend classes in person, they are also expected to participate in rigorous online learning programs to supplement those courses. Other conventional universities are integrating online learning into their curriculums to get students caught up on the basics outside of the classroom. Harvard Business School, for example, offers students entry-level accounting courses online so that they could start with more advanced material in person. How will universities continue to use the internet to teach their students? Will the future of education still be brick-and-mortar universities, or combination of the traditional model with one that is virtual? Does online education threaten the business model of residential universities?
OTHER NEWS:
Maker of Candy Crush Files for an I.P.O (NYTimes)
Netflix-Traffic Feud Leads to Video Slowdown (WSJournal)
Time Warner Cable Shareholder Sues to Prevent Comcast Merger (HuffPost)
No, Upworthy’s Traffic Didn’t Get Crushed by Facebook’s Algorithm Change (GigaOm)
Claire Groden is the podcast intern for PBS Mediashift and a senior at Dartmouth College. You can follow Claire on Twitter @ClaireGroden.
View Comments (1)
Hi! In your sentence that starts, "Adn, what about" you need to change "Adn" to "And". You don't need to post this comment. Have a great week!